Analyze the small group discussion in terms of leadership Chapter 10 by determining which leadership behaviors did or would have moved the group toward its goal.
Therefore, the conflict was resolved by separating from the lone offender, juror four calmly telling juror ten that he said enough and to not say anymore.
Juror 2 questions the likelihood that the boy, who was almost a foot shorter than his father, could have inflicted the downward stab wound found in the body. Needless to say, 12 jurors responsible for whether or not a young boy will receive the death penalty can be considered a stressful situation.
Source Conflict Benefits Group Communication As the film progressed other jury members would see the guilty stance weaken under the pressure of the different types of conflict.
You might include information relative to Juror 9, the switchblade discussion, or the eyeglasses discussion. Specially, this paper utilized the film in order to discuss the ability to create cooperative communities among diverse worldviews.
This proves to be a challenge as members of a group want to be appreciated and feel as though their point of view is valued as part of the greater conversation. List and describe the characteristics, skills, and strategies employed by Juror 8 Davis in his attempts to develop an effective team capable of reaching a consensus.
They may even hold the same views but because of miscommunication, conflict develops. Once he realized he was not being attacked personally by the other jury members his ego broke down and he then changed his vote to not guilty.
At the end of the film, he reveals to Juror 9 that his name is Davis, one of only two jurors to reveal his name; played by Henry Fonda. At the beginning of the film, the cameras are positioned above eye level and mounted with wide-angle lensesto give the appearance of greater depth between subjects, but as the film progresses the focal length of the lenses is gradually increased.
Juror 4, who also believes the boy is guilty, commands Juror 10 to sit down and not speak again.
An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". His troubled past with his own son was the cause of his disdain towards the young man on trial.
He reflects back to when his son punched him in the face and becomes further upset. He was the fourth juror and was self-assured that his decision was correct and that the defendant had murdered his father.
In addition, the hot conditions of the room as well as the time pressures presented from some members created even more stress. Lastly, Juror 7 is focused entirely on concluding the trial as quickly as possible as to make it in time for a baseball game.
A complete kinescope of that performance, which had been missing for years and was feared lost, was discovered in Identify the hidden agenda Our experience and preconceptions all contribute to our view of the world. Juror 9, seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his glassesrealizes that the woman who allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them in court out of vanity.
All jurors except 7 and 4 turn their backs to him. This correlates to his occupation of being an architect. He is polite and makes a point of speaking with proper English grammar.
Jurors 3 and 8 then conduct an experiment to see whether a shorter person could stab downwards on a taller person. Due to the factual evidence given the defendant was supposed to be charged as not guilty; however, the opposing party created such an emotional appeal to the jury that the jury in fact wrongly determined the defendant to be guilty.
According to Kouzes and Posnerit is important to form such cooperative communities in an effort to achieve greatness within groups as well as organizations. A Practical Application More important than the ability to identify examples of leadership and cooperative communities within the film is my personal ability to apply those lessons in pursuit of my own cooperative, productive, and moral community.
However, juror three was especially excitable and in defense of his ego against juror eight. Increasingly impatient, Juror 7 changes his vote to hasten the deliberation, which earns him the ire of other jurors especially 11 for voting frivolously; still he insists, unconvincingly, that he actually thinks the boy is not guilty.
An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". Be specific by analyzing how facts, examples, opinions, and statistics were employed in the film 12 angry men Chapter 7.
The Jury is supposed to be focusing strictly on fact; however, the instances in which emotion interferes with factual evidence are the moments in which we remember that these 12 men are only human.
A wisecracking, indecisive advertising executive. Review the reflective thinking process, ideal-solution, brainstorming, and single-question approaches. Through his constructive dialogue and even mannered tone of voice, Fonda was able to utilize all of the above concepts.
Conclusion More than 50 years after the production of 12 Angry Men, the film still has incredible value due to the themes presented. Their votes were shared publically with the rest of the Jurors and we begin to see how many of the Jurors are in some way being swayed into voting not guilty just for the sake of saving time and reaching a majority consensus.
12 Angry Men explores many techniques of consensus-building and the difficulties encountered in the process among a group of men whose range of personalities adds intensity and conflict.
It also explores the power one person has to elicit change. 12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis Paper Words | 5 Pages. Arthur Mcqueen SPCM a MWF April 17, Communication Analysis Paper 12 Angry Men For an in-depth look into the workings of small groups few movies have offered more than the beloved classic, 12 Angry Men.
In “12 Angry Men”, the main procedure governing the jurors is the act of each juror speaking individually in an arbitrary sequence of participation, which was This structure was ignored and the jurors interrupted each other when they felt their opinion was more important, leading to several breaks in.
12 Angry Men Communication Techniques.
Film Techniques in Twelve Angry Men Summary: Reviews the film Twelve Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet. Discusses the director's use of cinematic techniques, including lighting, music,and set design, to reinforce the themes of the story.
12 Angry Men (by 6 students) Task We observed trends in the communication of the group in the film and assessed the interpersonal skills of the jurors.
12 Angry Men explores many techniques of consensus-building and the difficulties encountered in the process among a group of men whose range of personalities adds intensity and conflict. It also explores the power one person has to elicit change.12 angry men communication techniques